Mr. SONG Yang graduated from Beijing Normal University with a LLM degree. At the beginning of his career, he mainly provided non-litigation specialized legal services for the New Third Board, IPO, equity investment, and equity acquisition, and permanent legal advisory services for companies listed on the New Third Board and other listed companies. His clients mainly include Wencan Group, Dongfang Precision, Yonyou Software, etc. He has built rich experience in corporate governance.
Later, he joined the Department of Material Commercial Disputes to provide companies and their investors with legal services for solving commercial disputes, including various disputes over internal corporate governance, various contract disputes in business operation, various disputes arising during investment and financing process, and labor disputes between companies and their employees, mainly for clients including Wencan Group, Shougang Holdings, AIMA Group, Zhonghai Trust, Pacific Securities, Hong Kong Juhong, Jintai Real Estate, Thunder Sky Winston, etc.
Thanks to his work experience in non-litigation corporate businesses, he is good at providing the best solution for commercial disputes based on non-litigation business with reference to factors in multiple aspects such as commercial operation and governance structure.
As a representative of a majority shareholder of a company, achieved breakthrough in a seemingly irrelevant case by exploring details in the absence of a written proxy shareholding agreement for requesting payment, found a core evidence clue, requested a court investigation order to get a large amount of direct and indirect evidence, and elaborated the fact and reasoning to prove the existence of the proxy holding relationship at the court, and eventually persuaded the collegiate bench to accept all the opinions of Blossom & Credit lawyers, hence successfully taking back the controlling power of the principal over the company, which completed the registration for change in shareholder with the administration for industry and commerce and achieved actual control over the company.
Represented a well-known securities company to demand payment for the principal and interests of defaulted bonds that were held by the securities company and issued by a listed company. The lawyer, making full use of professional advantages by combining non-litigation legal services with litigation legal services on the security market, detected a clue of valuable properties in the name of the issuer, promptly completed preservation of property, and eventually recovered the principal and interests of over RMB 50 million in total through judicial means, making the securities company the only creditor recovering both the principal and interests on this bond.
Represented a company and its majority shareholder to answer a malicious false lawsuit initiated by a minority shareholder in collusion with others by taking advantage of poor financial management of the company in the past. In the absence of direct evidence on repayment to the counterparty, the lawyer sorted out details of the case and detected a critical flaw in a key document, collected a large amount of indirect evidence, skillfully designed the trial strategy, including the order and timing for submitting evidence and the content and order for raising questions, and fully communicated with the judge to successfully reveal the collusion between company B and the party Z for initiating the false litigation, so as to force company B to withdraw the litigation against company A.
Represented a company and its majority shareholder to answer a case of dissolution initiated maliciously by minority shareholders. The lawyer conducted in-depth analysis of relevant provisions of the Company Law and judicial interpretations thereof, prepared concrete evidence, and considered the actual local conditions of the real estate company to present the interests to the court from the perspective of effects of dissolving the real estate company on the large number of real estate owners. Eventually, the court fully accepted the lawyer’s opinions and rejected all the claims of the two minority shareholders; moreover, the court of the second instance maintained the judgment of the first instance without supporting the appeal claims of the minority shareholders.
Represented a company to defense against the arbitration claims for nearly RMB 20 million raised by two minority shareholders, who were also senior officers, against the company on the ground of a payroll forged by taking advantage of their posts. The lawyer sorted out the history of the company from the beginning and the complicated dispute among the 3 shareholders of the company, prepared concrete evidence to prove that the actual monthly salary of the two minority shareholders were RMB 20,000, and fully examined the evidence submitted by the two minority shareholders to detect many inconsistencies in details, which eventually persuaded the labor arbitration commission to reject the arbitration claims of the minority shareholders. Later, the two minority shareholders initiated a case of labor dispute, but failed in the trial for both the first and the second instance, and then requested retrial, but their request for retrial was also rejected.
